{SAS}TB Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 (edited) First off, Hi I was wondering if i could get some kind of "official" response from PBbans on the following commands used either via the console or through additions to the config_mp file: waypointconheight 15 waypointiconwidth 15 and cg_fov 80 The fist amends the height and width of the "waypoint" icons such as "Target A", "Target B", "Capture" "Defuse" "Bomb" etc - The standard size is 36x 36 but can be a PITA obscuring areas and i particular the target points, this can be remedied by lowering the icon size as above. The second increases the Field of View from the standard 65 to 80 Both of these are non protected cvars that can be amended through console or altering your players config. Punkbuster / Evenbalance have suggested, in on open ongoing ticket, that an admin cvar check could result in a kick / local ban, but a "third party" AntiCheat measure may ban for this. I am trying to establish various bodies opinions on this and would welcome PBB's thoughts / stance Many thanks TB Edited February 28, 2008 by {SAS}TB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duality Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 A friend of mine uses cg_fov 80 with no problems - no kicks or bans: and he frequents on my server which streams to PBBans - complete with CVAR checks. I think it may depend which CVAR checks other admins have set up. Not sure about the others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fozzer Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 The only thing that will incur an addition to the MBI is a cheat related cvar/MD5 scan or banable PB violation. Everything else is at the server admins discretion and will result in a short kick for none compliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.