03/25/2006 14:20:15 - "Stuart Dunsmore"
"Note #2: No, even though those errors are something I want to look into, I do not see a link to the kick. That violation came from the client, so a server error really doesn't factor in. Now, that kick is for an external no recoil hack, but it has a higher chance of false positives than other detections. That player should be able to reproduce the kick, if he was running some other program at the same time. That is the only violation he ever got it seems, so I would lean towards the benifit of the doubt here."
I don't see anywhere in there where he said it WAS a false positive. just that it had a higher chance. he also said the player should be able to reproduce the kick. Where are the rest of the Notes.
I don't think the ban should be lifted unless EB says it's 100% a false positive, not on a "benefit of the doubt" decision.