Everson

(Doesn't count if they don't put the space in the post :P) http://www.pbbans.com/mbi-viewban-8d225a6d-vb172748.html http://www.pbbans.com/mbi-viewban-047490b3-vb172870.html Country: United States Region: AZ City: Prescott Valley You around the same date: Country: United States Region: CA City: Van Nuys Linked by Alias (used May 01-04, 2010). Between May 15th and 29th your BF2 GUID: 1f91fa86 you're logged using a different IP (not to mention in a different state). You're Clean. Looks like you used a leaked key on May 04, 2010.

No ban for that alias on BF2.

Did when I went trolling earlier...

I believe green is the best select location recommendation for you. Orange is further away and not recommended. Red is very bad. Does that key work?

Uhm, did you even consider the fact that the statement was relevant to the GSP who wants to provide COD:BO servers? Who should be fully informed and aware of customer opinions regarding a potential product. (answer honestly now? no.) P.S. I believe the same happened in the MW2 pre-order thread! It's just a bonus that it's Activision bashing :P

I assumed they were both separate features, i.e. like a server browser or play now button. As for the GSP monopoly and fair trade - possibly but I'm sure Activision would hide behind lawyers for the duration of the case

The whole VAC thing is still a deal breaker for most people. Maybe if you get anywhere this side of release you could save them from making the biggest mistake ever. I could deal with hosted files with a GSP if it was PB, like BF:BC2. No way on earth though am I getting files with a GSP when it's got VAC.

Was only real 32 which was officially supported, but 18 is definitely far less.

Merged into Call of Duty: Black Ops thread. I know VAC is #Fail.

VAC? Pffft, not even getting a pre-order out of me. Never ordered MW2, never going to.

As has been updated in the PM thread running with you a response was received from Tazzi. Frankly his attitude sucks and he has no respect for this community and our anti-cheat efforts, he does not take the time to listen nor does he completely understand the situation (or seem to want to). He's more focused on attempting to throw his weight around than dealing with his issues up front; despite the ample amount of support we've offered in order to point him in the right direction. The bottom line stands, while this individual remains a member of WWDF, the clan shall not be streaming here. Of course if the individual is removed we'd be willing to consider a future application from yourself; as you really shouldn't be held accountable for the very poor conduct of Tazzi.

I'll be CC'ing you in on a PM in a few minutes as Tazzi who is listed on our MBi has instigated a threat of potential legal action regarding this matter and a ban issued by a third party. We have a strict no harbouring cheaters policy (as above) and you will be required to remove this individual from your clan before any application for WWDF will be considered.

http://twitter.com/eversonj90/status/22718826255 http://twitter.com/eversonj90/status/22720454875

Either way your account wasn't suspended. Automated Hub Tool fixes the majority of issues so my suggestion would be for you to run it (links in my signature).

http://twitter.com/JD_2020/status/22648047318 That's 2am in the UK on September 2nd 2010 :( But hey... at least I'll have lots to read when I wake up.

After looking through your account and our staff forums I can't see any reference to us stopping your streaming. You server last streamed on August 22nd 2010 and since it has automatically marked itself as inactive and then disabled itself. All you need to do is reactivate it from within your Team Account and get it streaming again. All non-streaming issues are client side: so on August 22nd something must have been changed your end.

As I said, sit tight.

First of all the requirements aren't 'bs', they're requirements which were put in place to ensure the integrity of this Anti-Cheat community. Secondly we're not being picky, we have over 10,000 teams in our database, over 5,000 streaming servers and 10,000 members that we have to manage - that management requires standards to keep things easier to ensure continued smoothness with our operations. Either way our requirements are compulsory and must be continually met by streaming teams, the other streaming teams manage it... Finally a public rant gets you nowhere just chill and we'll review your account soon. I'm on mobile at the moment do if it hasn't progressed by the time I'm home I'll take a look at your account.

Just to note if you want live banning features etc you need to use a 1 instead of 0

Sidenote: Hmm, GT now works on admin ports? I've also manually updated your forum permissions so you're now an SGA.

Server Approved - Correct Server IP/Port, but still not streaming. Can you run the automated hub setup again and paste the output of the applet in this thread?

I believe these are you: COD2: 3ef9b71d (info) COD4: 1aff3283 (info) Your COD2 GUID appears to be in use in both Serbia and Spain but apart from that I can't see you personally responsible for any linked violations.

Things to be cautious of are the number of checks and the frequency of those checks. Our MCi config's are optimized for the checks that we do, however, adding mass additional checks, or incorrectly coded checks could result in lag, or false kicks. We only have verified known cheats within our config's - we can't really comment on the integrity of other checks (you should update your server with new MCi config's regularly). MD5 checks are the only type of automated checks as the Battlefield series does not support CVAR checks. PunkBuster doesn't automatically include the checks as they first need to obtain cheat files in order to be able to code up the detection system to catch them. However, EB does update it's detections every now and again which is why new violation numbers appear out of the blue. While we won't comment on other AC organisations and their operations in depth but in general - PBBans has the most stringent application requirements in order to protect the integrity of the community. Those that don't have such stringent requirements, in the very least, are likely to have a ban list which doesn't hold complete integrity. As to whether or not people stream to other AC organisations that's their choice. One could argue it increases protection however another could argue that it reduces the integrity of your team's anti-cheat effort.

Not entirely convinced we're going to get all MP information on the 1st - may be later in the month but we'll see.

From the above line, if you copied and pasted just be sure to have the 0 after PB_SV_UConAdd set to 1 if you want live banning etc. i.e.